Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Online Privacy Laws for Countries

Now that I have done some thinking and writing about privacy concerns posed by Web Analytics (Oh and I need to make sure I use the right word, read article to see why), I was prompted to research on the privacy laws of different countries[1]. This was an interesting research, considering the various stages different countries are in the current web world. US, an obvious choice, EU & China are some that I have tried to research on for their internet privacy laws and provided some snippets here. 

Before jumping into the privacy laws, an interesting image I found online triggered an equally interesting thought. Does anyone associate themselves with this image based on the country he/she lives in? I don't, rather I cannot! Almost every country in the current web analytics world has most of their internet users tracked some way or the other. So, there is no way for us to think that we are the only ones in there. There is always someone "watching".

Picture Courtesy [2]: How many people do you think will ever feel this way in the current digital world?








While researching on privacy, I found an interesting analogy and thought to quote that as well[3]. This is an analogy of Google Analytics to privacy.


"A parent standing on a street corner counts the number of cars that drive pass a school gate. They are interested in safety and traffic flow. Hence they count the number of cars passing per minute, note their type e.g. car, SUV, buss, lorry etc., take a note of their speed and any other factors, such as weather and amount of day-light. All users of this particular section of road are effected by such data – the local commune, parents, children, teachers, commuters, shops and business, and delivery companies.

The observer has a legitimate reason to observe and measure traffic conditions and there are no privacy issues with this. No personal identifiable information (PII) is collected and traffic is reported in aggregate. That is, individuals are not tracked. This is how Google Analytics works."


Now looking at the bigger picture, privacy is split up as; 1. Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or 2. Non PII [4]. The non PII is used to track the trends or person's behavior on the website, which can help companies with several of their studies. Most countries have concerns with companies collecting the PII from customers without being transparent of not informing them about this data collection.

Let's start with one of the most intriguing growth stories of the past decade, CHINA. It is a different story when it comes to internet privacy here. It is not just the eCommerce or web analytics companies that track customer data, but it is the government [4] that wants to track online journey of its citizens. The Chinese government intends to control all or most of the web content usage and flow to ensure nothing against it is mentioned anywhere in the web world. An example of this would be the Chinese journalist, sentenced to 10 years of prison for having sent a "private email" with some of his views on Chinese government. Knowing this, I would probably think twice to browse internet if and when I go to China. 

Coming to the other union of nations, EU, the recent EU privacy law does require companies to make its tracking more transparent by taking consent from the customer if they agree to have their data tracked/shared. How many of you would read through the entire terms of service when you download a software, make an online transaction or are even asked to sign/acknowledge before agreeing to them? Would we then even consider to read through the long terms of service detailing how our privacy is at stake if we agree to them?

http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/smbiz/gr/help/bm_accepttos.gif

Though a welcome sign by the EU to direct companies in taking customer consent before collecting their PII, how much of this new law would really reduce privacy intrusions will need to be seen... 

One would consider US to be a more "free" nation when compared to China. But, as I write this post, here is a latest update on the internet privacy law in the US. CISPA is being reintroduced by some leaders which would give access, to companies and government alike, to collect private customer data in the name of national security. To what extent would this bill be hampering the privacy of customers in the US? Do we need to be worried as to how our data will be used? One could argue that with the growing knowledge and concern of cyber security threats, it is in the best interest of the nation to have active tracking of individuals' online activities. But, where is the line that would define what level of tracking is actually needed for the purpose of identifying and controlling such threats? Has China, with its vast control of internet traffic, been able to control cyber threats/attacks? With the kind of technological advancements that we have achieved, is there any other way to keep track of online activities without needing to have private data.

References:
[1] Digital Analytics Association - http://www.digitalanalyticsassociation.org/?page=privacy
[2] http://glassboard.com/blog/2012/07/18/recent-privacy-policy-gains-hellooo-mobile/
[3] Advanced Web Metrics:Measuring success - http://www.advanced-web-metrics.com/blog/2012/10/04/privacy-web-analytics-google-and-ketchup/
[4] Wikipedia.org - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_privacy

7 comments:

  1. I have come to the realization that everything I do online is observed and tracked by many. I think our society is becoming more passive on their online privacy as well. We are demanding less and less.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is really tough to imagine the amount of monitoring that happens on a regular basis. Right from the website, eCommerce company to the government, you are left alone by anyone.

      Delete
  2. Very true that CISPA is a very slippery slope & raises all kinds of questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Luke.. Just happened to view news about it while writing this blog. I'll have to research further to understand what all it entails.

      Delete
  3. Well, as you noted, how many of us read through the contents of agreement while installing software or online agreements. Just click next, next, next for desperately finding finish button.

    With the amount of digital content which is currently online, it is more evident that govt. organization wants to keep an eye on what is happening around the world and eventually share the info with each other govt.

    Also, with the number of online transactions we do, I am sure, our data is definitely been looked at by someone or the other. Thankfully, salaries are not huge to be very worried about. Adding to that, there are better things for govt., hackers to worry about that individuals. Atleast as of now. God knows, what is lying ahead of us.

    I think we as individuals got to have our own life agreements on what needs to be shared online and what not. May be, some of the spy movies will help us learn a little more because over the years what I have seen in movies eventually is either true (CIA, no one knew it existed) or technology gets implemented (mobiles, transparent display screens). May be I have written a story myself. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, maybe you did write a story Sandeep!! :-)

      But I agree that we need to have control on the data sharing, but whom do we get that control from. We can only get it if we are given a choice. And as both of us pointed, we as individuals never really look into the details of an agreement/terms of service before signing it, so in part, or for the most part, it is us that have to change. :-)

      Delete