Showing posts with label Browser Cookies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Browser Cookies. Show all posts

Friday, February 28, 2014

Digital Footprints - stealing your identity or saving you money?


Do online security settings actually help your privacy – at what cost to you?

 A person’s digital footprint is developed and grown exponentially as we turn to digital means for commerce, communication, entertainment.  Digital footprints as noted by Wikipedia are typically classified as active and passive. Active footprints are created where we have an account. A passive footprint is when your browser or device is remembered, without explicit direction from you.   As consumers, we should control what is recorded about us whether active or passive. However, will this actually help or hinder what we want to accomplish online.
The seemingly small changes in our practices are being capitalized on by marketers using digital media trackers and tools for analysis.  Eventually we hear on the news (if you still watch broadcast tv) or read on your favorite news site that your privacy may be at risk with the social media app update.  Just as the print media and propaganda of old, it is meant to elicit a reaction.  So hordes of people rush to their various accounts and do their best to lock down their private information.  We change settings, opt-out of offers, reduce our risk – or so we think.   Tracking our activity online has been around as long as the World Wide Web has been around. Almost all electronic devices have logs; the difference now is companies are finding ways to make those logs of our seemingly random activities.  Whether we are trying to see the weather, buying diapers or emailing our grandmother – that information is useful to someone.  For me, the scary part is someone is willing to pay for that information.  But what is the actual risk?  If we are shopping online for diapers is it a bad thing that the site search engine we used to find Pampers keeps a record of that.  When we look at product reviews on Amazon, do we care that diapers show up 2 weeks later as a suggested product perhaps because the cost has actually dropped?

Companies want to sell you something be it goods or services, and we go to companies because we want something. Yet, we consider information gathering online as being victimized by those companies.  The EU has said that some of this type of tracking is indeed wrong and forcing companies to put a notice to all website visitors[i] – we want to know who you are and want to track your activities.  When you visit your regular gas station, the market closest to your home or favorite restaurant you surely notice patterns of employees and likely have favorite servers or checkers who in turn get to know you and how you like to do business with them.  So why do people worry that the personalization you get from your local service providers is trying to be mimicked by your circle of online providers[ii]?  The issue seems to be in the sharing. If my favorite server at my neighborhood cafe knows how I like my eggs and what beverage I’m likely to order, that server isn't going to tell the gas station attendant.  But online, we can look up a new car and ads for that brand or perhaps even that exact car down to the color we spent the most time looking at may show up in banner ads on several different sites we visit afterwards.  Is it a detriment that the web can get to know us quicker, maybe better, than the people we interact with?  We want privacy, but we are also consumers and most of us have limited means.  Do we want to hunt for the best price by driving to multiple stores in a car or on public transit - or have a company offer up their best price while we do other random things online and have that shipped to us for free within 2 days? 
In reality, we are in control of our data.  For those paranoid about truly personal information being gleaned to allow hacks into their various accounts for devious purposes, no amount of protection seems enough.  If you don’t want to register your full name, DOB, mother’s maiden name with a  company – then don’t.  Could this limit your access to some online resources, absolutely.  It is not any sites fault that you posted you were on vacation, hints to your passwords or answers to common security questions on social media[i]. Computers can only regurgitate the inputs we give them.  Otherwise, this posting would have written itself and been better.  In the meantime, I’ll allow Ikea to remember the size of light bulb I needed. I may not tip the tracking cookie, but they’ll likely keep my business – and loyalty is all any company really wants from us.


Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Cookies, the Pros and Cons.

The good and bad of cookies.

Cookies are “a piece of text that a Web server can store on a user's hard disk.”[1]The term is being used a lot in the media today. With a push for greater privacy the cookie has come under attack. Online advertisers are using cookies to assist them in tracking you online habits in order for them to more efficiently advertise to you. But before you say that you want to get rid of all cookies for good, there is some value in a cookie.

The good.

Cookies can be used by websites for a variety of good reasons. The main reason that cookies came into existence is to make the online experience better by allowing websites to know that you are using a specific computer and what your preferences are. Examples of the benefits are:

· Shopping carts

· Remaining logged in

· Store user preferences related to specific site

· Security - Verify that you are who you say you are (when you have to answer a security question the first time you log in to a website, but don’t have to after that)


The bad

Cookies have received a bad name for some of the following reasons. Some users may not view these as problem, but with internet security becoming a bigger concern more users are becoming cautious on the web.

· Creates a profile (perhaps temporary) with a company that you may not want t profile with.

· Third party cookies allow marketers to track you across multiple websites.

· There are some concerns involving cookie theft or hijacking.


Overall, cookies allow for a better online experience. The threat of the marketer viewing your activity does not outweigh the benefits of cookies. If you are one who is concerned with cookies you can disable cookies on your browser by following this Wiki [2]. I recommend disabling third party cookies if you want to reduce the "creepy" factor of advertisers. You can also see what cookies have been stored on your computer and delete them by searching online for your browser to find out where they are stored.

Monday, February 17, 2014

Browser Cookies 2.0 - Google AdID - The Holy Grail of user information

Browser Cookies?!?!

Tania recently posted a blog entry explaining what web cookies are, how they work, and how to manage them.  At a basic level cookies allow information to be aggregated about you and your browsing habits.  This helps content providers (but mostly marketers) tailer a more relevant experience for users but also raises privacy and security concerns as these shadow profiles are enriched over time.

Google browser cookies - Google AdIDBrowser cookies come in two varieties, first party and third party. [1]  The first party variety are generally the more benign of the two and only aggregating data in the current site where you are visiting.  Third party cookies however, go where you go.  They can collect product preferences from Pinterest, employment information from LinkedIn, and just about anything else from social media.  This cocktail of information can be powerful for marketers and potentially dangerous in the wrong hands.

As users, we tend to leverage multiple browsers, tabs, and even platforms (phone, tablet, desktop, e-reader, gaming systems, etc) to facilitate our data and connectivity addictions.  This makes it more difficult for the third party cookies to get the "full" story.  Users can also block and delete cookies (see "Do Not Track").  These weaknesses have lead to companies like Google to create solutions to stitch some of these data holes together (like linking all your Crome profiles together, platform agnostic).

Holy Grail?!?!

intelligent third party cookie
It would be naive to think that companies would stop short of the 'Holy Grail' of user information. Google is already working on an alternative to cookies called AdID.  Essentially, the search giant is building an "anonymous identifier for advertising, or AdID, that would replace third-party cookies as the way advertisers track people's internet browsing activity for marketing purposes." [2]

Browser Cookies vs Google AdID - Source: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304682504579157780178992984


There are interesting implications of this development [3] but its important to note that the devil is in the details, all of which are speculative at this stage of development.

The Good:

  • The AdID is intended to be an anonymous
  • Ownership of the AdID is consolidated which can allow for better governance. This is a slight improvement over the smorgasbord of third parties tracking user traffic with almost no governance.
  • Users will theoretically be given tdiscretion over how much data (or which data) is aggregated
  • There might be a "private browsing option"

The Bad:

  • Although intended to be anonymous, it has a huge potential to be linked to something not anonymous like an email or G+ profile
  • Tracking is tracking. The information can be willingly sold, lawfully subpoenaed, or wrongfully stolen
  • If you are a company tracking users with cookies, future browsers like Crome, may auto-block (verses the current opt-in) cookies. Your only option will be to pay the big boys for that information.

The bottom line

Should we hate Google for doing this to us? It's hard to blame them for wanting to profit off the information that they serve us for free.  Besides; Microsoft, Apple, and FaceBook are in the game too. [4] Users need to take more ownership of their personal information and activities and choose when and how it can be used, otherwise, someone else will.


=========================================================
[1] http://adage.com/article/digital/google-s-plan-replace-cookies/244302/
[2] http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/18/google-adid-an-anonymous-identifier-advertising-cookie/
[3] http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/what-is-google-adid-and-how-will-it-replace-browser-cookies/
[4] http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304682504579157780178992984